Judicial Review rules in favour of Betfair

20/07/2012 | By More

Full press release here: –

https://corporate.betfair.com/media/press-releases/2012.aspx

Basically William Hill have lost their case, which was arguing that an undefined group of Betfair customers should paying levy on profits. This premise carefully ignored the fact that Betfair customers already pay levy via Betfair by proxy and brushed over a number of other contradictory issues. From my view point and that of the friend of mine who is in the legal profession, it looked more like a competitive action than a legal one. When Betfair made an announcement of funding for racing recently, that isolated William Hill even further.

Hopefully racing can get on with the business of winning new, younger, technology savy customers, rather than trying to stop emergent technologies. That will ensure interest in racing continues long into the future.

Loading

Tags: , , ,

Category: Betfair, Industry news

About the Author ()

I left a good job in the consumer technology industry to go a trade on Betfair for a living way back in June 2000. I've been here ever since pushing very boundaries of what's possible on betting exchanges and loved every minute of it.

Comments are closed.

Hypersmash.com